Trump v. China Administration for Industry and commerce, the first instance lost the appeal also los winavi

Trump v. Chinese administration against the first instance appeal also against Sohu news case: because the registration step in the evening, according to the Trumpt tower Chinese to cover a number of "(2015) high (know) the final word no. 345th" "Donald? Trump and People’s Republic of China State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board other the second instance administrative judgment", December 7, 2006 by Trump to the People’s Republic of China State Administration for Industry and Commerce Bureau (hereinafter referred to as the trademark trademark office) filed, designated "TRUMP" trademark use in the thirty-seventh types of commercial real estate, residential and hotel interior decoration, repair and other services. However, the "TRUMP" trademark in November 24, 2006 by another person named Dong Wei to the Trademark Office to apply for registration, approved the use of thirty-seventh types of construction supervision services. The trademark exclusive right to use the trademark until January 20, 2020. In November 30, 2009, the Trademark Office to make trademark notice of dismissal, for Trump to apply for trademark in thirty-seventh kinds of commercial real estate, residential and hotel air conditioning equipment installation and repair; commercial, residential and hotel real estate interior repair; commercial, residential and hotel real estate heating equipment installation and repair, commercial and residential buildings; and the hotel real estate elevator installation and repair services on the application for registration shall be the preliminary approval and announcement, but to provide commercial, residential and hotel real estate building, residential and hotel information; commercial real estate building information service is to be rejected. Donald refuses to accept the decision of the People’s Republic of China, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of. The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board decided in February 10, 2014, I think Trump filed trademark and trademark application form, the other is consistent in terms of call letters, has a similar trademark; the trademark specify the use of "commercial, residential and hotel real estate construction; provide commercial and residential real estate and hotel buildings the information service and the cited trademark approved service" construction, plant construction and other similar services to two, if the trademark coexist in the market, easy to produce consumer confusion of source, use constituted in similar trademarks on similar services. The evidence submitted by Donald and Trump is not sufficient to prove that the application of a trademark can be distinguished from the cited trademark, nor can it be used as a basis for the registration of a trademark. Donald? Trump said "all the cited trademark without permission, Donald? Trump’s name as a trademark application for registration, harm others the right to name" the trial of the case should belong to the scope of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall not hear. Therefore, V is the first prosecution to the Beijing first intermediate people’s court, was rejected again appealed to the Beijing Higher People’s court, the high court of Beijing on January 7, 2015 accepted, in May 18, 2015 made a final decision, dismissed the appeal and upheld the original verdict. First, the second instance case acceptance fee of one hundred yuan each, Donald (Trump) has been paid. According to the law.相关的主题文章: